TSLA445.3000.02999%
GM78.2402.43%
F14.5751.005%
RIVN14.3600.09%
CYD50.535-0.485%
HMC25.6151.245%
TM190.5203.63%
CVNA68.905-0.995%
PAG169.9853.405%
LAD278.6205.4%
AN193.6702.56%
GPI335.2207.44%
ABG195.5002.65%
SAH77.0900.97%
TSLA445.3000.02999%
GM78.2402.43%
F14.5751.005%
RIVN14.3600.09%
CYD50.535-0.485%
HMC25.6151.245%
TM190.5203.63%
CVNA68.905-0.995%
PAG169.9853.405%
LAD278.6205.4%
AN193.6702.56%
GPI335.2207.44%
ABG195.5002.65%
SAH77.0900.97%
TSLA445.3000.02999%
GM78.2402.43%
F14.5751.005%
RIVN14.3600.09%
CYD50.535-0.485%
HMC25.6151.245%
TM190.5203.63%
CVNA68.905-0.995%
PAG169.9853.405%
LAD278.6205.4%
AN193.6702.56%
GPI335.2207.44%
ABG195.5002.65%
SAH77.0900.97%

FTC returns $9.8 million to Napleton Automotive Group customers impacted by discriminatory practices

Refunds in FTC cases are broken down by state using the interactive dashboards for refund data provided by the Commission.
FTC

Image Sources: Ed Napleton Acura

In April of this year, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the State of Illinois filed a complaint against Napleton, a sizable multi-state auto dealer group based in Illinois, for charging customers illegal junk fees for unnecessary “add-ons” and for charging Black customers disproportionately more for financing. The lawsuit claimed that Napleton employees charged consumers for services, including paint protection, gap insurance, and extended warranties that they did not request. Consumers were forced to pay hundreds to thousands of dollars in illegal junk fees.

According to a poll that was included as evidence in the complaint, 83% of buyers from dealerships were tricked into paying junk fees for add-ons. One of the customers mentioned in the complaint claimed that after making a comparable down payment, the dealership in Arlington Heights, Illinois, charged him about $4,000 in add-on expenses.

The settlement forced Napleton to create a comprehensive fair lending program, one of whose features will be a cap on the additional interest markup they can charge customers.

The FTC also proposed a rule banning junk fees and “bait-and-switch” advertising tactics in response to the lawsuit. The new rule will safeguard consumers and trustworthy dealers by making the car-buying process more transparent and competitive. Additionally, it would allow the Commission to get money back from customers who have been duped or charged without permission.

“As auto prices surge, the Commission is taking comprehensive action to prohibit junk fees, bait-and-switch advertising, and other practices that hit consumers’ pocketbooks,” said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “Our proposed rule would save consumers time and money and help ensure a level playing field for honest dealers.”

Some opponents have been outspoken about the proposed ruling, including President and CEO of NADA, Mike Stanton. Stanton says it seems that the FTC wants to “radically change the way people buy and sell cars.” He says there are already solidified laws against unfair and deceptive practices, which all dealers approve of and agree to follow. NADA sent the FTC a 200-page letter that points out that the proposed rules are a “rush to judgment” and asks the Commission to reconsider them.

In an announcement made yesterday by the FTC, Consumers who suffered because of the discriminatory actions and junk fees of Illinois-based Napleton Automotive Group are receiving settlements from the Federal Trade Commission totaling more than $9.8 million. Averaging $147 each, the agency is sending 66,355 checks. Checks must be cashed in 90 days by the recipients.

Refunds in FTC cases are broken down by state using the interactive dashboards for refund data provided by the Commission. However, the U.S. The Supreme Court determined in 2021 that the Commission does not have the right to file a lawsuit for financial relief in federal court under Section 13(b). As a result of that decision, the Commission will find it more difficult to compensate consumers who have been damaged by unfair or deceptive practices by returning money to them. The Commission has requested Congress to allow it to recover money for consumers. In this case, though, customers can call Epiq, the refund administrator, at 1-888-691-6050 if they have any queries concerning their refund as a customer. The Commission never requests payment upfront or account details in order to issue refunds.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition and protect and educate consumers. Visit consumer.ftc.gov to learn more about consumer issues, or ReportFraud.ftc.gov to report fraud, scams, and dishonest company practices.


Did you enjoy this article? Please share your thoughts, comments, or questions regarding this topic by connecting with us at newsroom@cbtnews.com.

Be sure to follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, and TikTok to stay up to date.

While you’re here, don’t forget to subscribe to our email newsletter for all the latest auto industry news from CBT News.

More from Articles
Why the military just called Detroit's Big Three automakers

Why the military just called Detroit’s Big Three automakers

- May 14, 2026
There’s a conversation happening behind closed doors in Washington that should make every American pay attention, and it has nothing to do with EV mandates or fuel economy targets. This...
Trump’s China visit raises new questions for U.S. automakers

Trump’s China visit raises new questions for U.S. automakers

- May 14, 2026
On the Dash: Dealers should expect continued uncertainty around EV sourcing, tariffs, and future U.S.-China trade policy. National security concerns surrounding connected vehicles could reshape future technology standards and inventory...
Honda posts first annual loss as EV strategy reset triggers $10B writedown

Honda posts first annual loss as EV strategy reset triggers $10B writedown

- May 14, 2026
On the Dash: Honda’s renewed focus on hybrids could boost showroom demand as consumers continue to favor practical electrified options. Slower EV adoption is forcing automakers to prioritize profitability and...
More shoppers considering EVs, price and charging availability still driving many away

More shoppers considering EVs, price and charging availability still driving many away

- May 14, 2026
On the Dash: Gas prices pushed EV consideration higher in April, 26% now "very likely" to consider an EV Purchase price is the most frequent objection, followed by range and...
CBT News
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.