TSLA391.000-27.45%
GM82.110-0.93%
F14.900-0.44%
RIVN16.350-1.77%
CYD56.760-1.4%
HMC26.700-1.23%
TM177.160-2.34%
CVNA66.5000.31%
PAG171.020-0.59%
LAD288.840-1.76%
AN187.720-0.42%
GPI311.0005.57%
ABG190.9800.83%
SAH82.160-2.16%
TSLA391.000-27.45%
GM82.110-0.93%
F14.900-0.44%
RIVN16.350-1.77%
CYD56.760-1.4%
HMC26.700-1.23%
TM177.160-2.34%
CVNA66.5000.31%
PAG171.020-0.59%
LAD288.840-1.76%
AN187.720-0.42%
GPI311.0005.57%
ABG190.9800.83%
SAH82.160-2.16%
TSLA391.000-27.45%
GM82.110-0.93%
F14.900-0.44%
RIVN16.350-1.77%
CYD56.760-1.4%
HMC26.700-1.23%
TM177.160-2.34%
CVNA66.5000.31%
PAG171.020-0.59%
LAD288.840-1.76%
AN187.720-0.42%
GPI311.0005.57%
ABG190.9800.83%
SAH82.160-2.16%

Automakers drag feet on sustainable, ethical supply chains in 2023

A new study highlights the slow progress automakers are making toward sustainable and ethical supply chains
A new study highlights the slow progress automakers are making toward sustainable and ethical supply chains.

Automakers made significant progress toward clean, ethical, and sustainable supply chains in 2023 but still have immense room for improvement in the years ahead.

In its second annual automotive supply chain leaderboard, Lead the Charge, an advocacy network seeking to transform the car business into a more sustainable and ethical industry, identified the changes 18 major auto manufacturers made over the last year to transition away from fossil fuels and avoid human rights infractions.

Their findings indicated that, while the vast majority of brands made some form of progress, U.S. automakers had made the most significant improvement from the previous study. Ford took first place overall, beating last year’s winner, Mercedes-Benz, after improving its average score by 9 points for a final score of 42 points. Mercedes was only two points behind in 2023, earning the second-best score of 40 points. Tesla came in third place, with a tally of 35 points, but also made the most significant supply chain improvements out of all brands examined, rising 21 points in only a year. Volvo and Stellantis took fourth and fifth place, respectively, with scores of 32 and 27 points. The brands with the lowest scores, from best to worst, were Honda (8 points), Toyota (7 points), BYD (4 points), GAC (2 points), and SAIC (1 point).

However, the overall scores hide notable differences in the way some automakers have prioritized ethics and sustainability. For instance, Ford received 54 points for its approach to human rights and responsible sourcing but only 29 points for its supply chains and progress toward achieving environmental-friendly operations. Stellantis similarly received 37 points for its ethics approach but only 16 points for its logistics. Even Tesla, the world’s foremost electric vehicle manufacturer next to China’s BYD, saw an eight-point difference between its sustainability score (31 points) and human rights score (39 points).

But whether examining these companies through the lens of ethics or sustainability, the automotive industry, as a whole, has a long road ahead before it can meet the standards expected of all business sectors in the modern world. In terms of their supply chains, the average score of all automakers examined in Lead the Charge’s research was merely 16 points. On a human rights and sourcing basis, the score was just 21 points. Both numbers represent improvements of only 5 and 3 points from the year before.

While change can be difficult and painstakingly slow, automakers must avoid resting on their laurels every time they inch closer to their ultimate moral and environmental goals. Holding the industry accountable will be essential to making real progress. Above all, remember that sustainable supply chains and ethical sourcing are more than numbers on a chart that manufacturers may respect or ignore at their whim, but rather the standard to which all industries must be held. Failing to meet these standards is a disservice to the consumers, workers, dealers, business partners, suppliers, and, in truth, every earthly resident impacted by the automotive sector.

Read More
More from Articles
Used-vehicle wholesale prices edge higher in May, EVs lead the way

Used-vehicle wholesale prices edge higher in May, EVs lead the way

- June 5, 2026
On the Dash: Wholesale used-vehicle prices edged higher in May, rising 3.6% year over year. Used EV prices surged 11.9% annually, driven by sustained high gas prices. Compact cars posted...
China's auto treat: America draws the red line

China’s auto treat: America draws the red line

- June 5, 2026
If you think the debate over Chinese vehicles is about cheaper cars showing up at American dealerships, you’re missing the bigger story—and it’s one policymakers in Washington are no longer...
Trump weighs in on right-to-repair debate after meeting with automakers, dealers

Trump weighs in on right-to-repair debate after meeting with automakers, dealers

- June 5, 2026
On the Dash: The right-to-repair debate remains active in Washington and could affect dealership service operations. Dealers continue to oppose broader repair-data legislation, citing intellectual property and aftermarket concerns. Congress...
JPMorgan boosts Tesla price target to $475

JPMorgan boosts Tesla price target to $475, citing autonomous tech and software growth

- June 5, 2026
On the Dash: JPMorgan sees Tesla's future growth extending beyond vehicle sales and increasingly tied to software, AI and autonomous driving. The firm's $475 price target reflects growing Wall Street...