TSLA403.750-0.47%
GM83.6101.135%
F12.1100.16%
RIVN11.515-0.155%
CYD23.840-0.16%
HMC33.8300.15%
TM196.0601.21%
CVNA67.2008.15%
PAG212.1730.2225%
LAD296.6307.94%
AN166.5102.33%
GPI255.1455.605%
ABG199.0005.47%
SAH60.575-2.545%
TSLA403.750-0.47%
GM83.6101.135%
F12.1100.16%
RIVN11.515-0.155%
CYD23.840-0.16%
HMC33.8300.15%
TM196.0601.21%
CVNA67.2008.15%
PAG212.1730.2225%
LAD296.6307.94%
AN166.5102.33%
GPI255.1455.605%
ABG199.0005.47%
SAH60.575-2.545%
TSLA403.750-0.47%
GM83.6101.135%
F12.1100.16%
RIVN11.515-0.155%
CYD23.840-0.16%
HMC33.8300.15%
TM196.0601.21%
CVNA67.2008.15%
PAG212.1730.2225%
LAD296.6307.94%
AN166.5102.33%
GPI255.1455.605%
ABG199.0005.47%
SAH60.575-2.545%

UAW swiftly rejects GM’s offer of 16% wage increase ahead of strike deadline

The GM bid beats Ford's slightly, but Fain rejected it because he claims it, "Insults our very worth."
The UAW union received a counteroffer from GM, which included a proposed 16% wage increase and a 56% pay increase for new workers

Image Source: UAW rejects insulting offer | LinkedIn

The United Auto Workers union received a counteroffer from General Motors, which included a proposed 16% wage increase for the top earners in its facilities and a 56% pay increase for new workers who make less. Shawn Fain, president of the UAW, promptly responded and called the proposal “insulting.”

The wage increase is marginally more than what Ford, a competing company, promised the union but remains far less than the 46% pay increase that would arise from the UAW’s initial offer. Additionally, GM shortened the period for the highest wage, increased the pay for temporary workers, and added $11,000 in payments to protect against inflation.

GM made the offer with only one week left until the deadline for renewal of the union’s contract with Detroit’s Big 3. Fain also seeks to reestablish guaranteed pensions, cost-of-living adjustments, retiree healthcare, and a significant boost.

The GM bid beats Ford’s slightly, but Fain rejected it because he claims it, “Insults our very worth.” However, the offers from GM and Ford do not include retiree benefits, which were phased out for new hires in 2007. 

Fain’s initial proposal reinstated retiree benefits, a significant component of the additional labor costs that automakers predict will increase fees by $80 billion over four years.

With a $6,000 one-time payment and an additional $5,000 throughout the contract, GM offered to provide inflation protection. The entire amount is $1,000 less than what Ford offered.

After six years, both companies pay entry-level employees the top rate of roughly $32 per hour. After four years, the GM offer would bring them to a minimum of $28. Additionally, GM proposed designating Juneteenth as a paid holiday.

Further Reading
More from Articles
Fed holds interest rates steady as auto loan costs stay high

Fed holds interest rates steady as auto loan costs stay high

- October 29, 2026
On the Dash: Fed votes to hold key interest rate at 3.75% to 4.00%, with two officials dissenting in favor of a hike. Auto loan costs keep climbing; J.D. Power...
Ford raises 2026 profit outlook despite higher costs and truck production challenges

Ford raises 2026 profit outlook despite higher costs and truck production challenges

- October 29, 2026
On the Dash: Ford raised the lower end of its 2026 adjusted operating profit guidance by $500 million to $10.5 billion, keeping the upper end at $11 billion. The automaker...
Carvana Q3 revenue hits record $8 billion as retail sales climb 39%

Carvana Q3 revenue hits record $8 billion as retail sales climb 39%

- October 29, 2026
On the Dash:  Carvana sold a record 217,385 retail units in the third quarter, up 39% year over year, as revenue increased 42% to $8.04 billion. The online retailer generated...
Beyond digitization: Why title integrity matter to dealership risk and compliance

Beyond digitization: Why title integrity matters to dealership risk and compliance

- October 29, 2026
As automotive retail becomes increasingly digital, dealerships face a growing challenge: ensuring that faster transactions do not introduce greater financial and compliance risks. Vehicle titling remains a critical vulnerability. Incomplete ownership...

Add us as a preferred source on Google

CBT News
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.