TSLA364.270-1.93%
GM82.200-4.42%
F13.210-0.4%
RIVN14.990-0.41%
CYD35.4000.88%
HMC32.200-0.33%
TM191.530-2.38%
CVNA65.120-0.72%
PAG212.610-2.14%
LAD316.270-5.41%
AN168.290-6.59%
GPI246.420-8.53%
ABG183.060-4.85%
SAH63.660-2.29%
TSLA364.270-1.93%
GM82.200-4.42%
F13.210-0.4%
RIVN14.990-0.41%
CYD35.4000.88%
HMC32.200-0.33%
TM191.530-2.38%
CVNA65.120-0.72%
PAG212.610-2.14%
LAD316.270-5.41%
AN168.290-6.59%
GPI246.420-8.53%
ABG183.060-4.85%
SAH63.660-2.29%
TSLA364.270-1.93%
GM82.200-4.42%
F13.210-0.4%
RIVN14.990-0.41%
CYD35.4000.88%
HMC32.200-0.33%
TM191.530-2.38%
CVNA65.120-0.72%
PAG212.610-2.14%
LAD316.270-5.41%
AN168.290-6.59%
GPI246.420-8.53%
ABG183.060-4.85%
SAH63.660-2.29%

New IIHS crash test reveals poor ratings for the top mid-size pickups

The risk of a fatal injury is now higher for belted occupants in the rear than for those in the front seat.
Institute , IIHS

Image Source: Youtube

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, IIHS, recently tested crew-cab versions of the Chevrolet Colorado, Ford Ranger, Jeep Gladiator, Nissan Frontier, and Toyota Tacoma, and none of the trucks received top ratings for rear-occupant safety.

The institute updated its moderate overlap front collision test last year. In that test, cars at 40 mph collide with a fixed barrier occupying 40% of the car’s width. According to the institute, “research showed that in newer vehicles, the risk of a fatal injury is now higher for belted occupants in the rear than for those in the front.” This is why the revision added a dummy to the backseat. The safety of rear-seat passengers has not decreased; instead, the front has become safer while the back has received little attention. 

In the new test, a dummy the size of a 12-year-old kid or a petite woman rides in the backseat behind a dummy around the size of a typical adult male. To receive a good rating, a vehicle must secure the occupants in place to guard against an elevated risk of head, neck, chest, or thigh injuries. IIHS also tracks how close the dummy’s head is to the front seatback and other interior objects.

In addition, IIHS assigns vehicles one of four grades: poor, marginal, acceptable, or good. The Nissan’s acceptable rating for the rear-seat dummy was the best of the five trucks in the test. The Chevrolet, Jeep, and Toyota all had poor performances, while Ford’s performance was marginal. The dummy’s head also came worryingly close to the front seatback in all vehicles but the Jeep.

Further Reading
More from Articles
GM looks beyond EVs with focus on V-8-powered pickups and Patriot missiles

GM looks beyond EVs with new V-8-powered pickups and Patriot missiles

- September 18, 2026
On the Dash: GM Defense delivered Patriot missile parts to Lockheed Martin 22 days after signing its contract. The redesigned 2027 Silverado and Sierra add new 5.7-liter and 6.6-liter V-8...
unifor

Stellantis faces potential strike as Unifor talks remain at impasse

- September 18, 2026
On the Dash: Stellantis faces a new labor deadline as its Canadian contract with Unifor expires Sept. 20. The future of the Brampton plant remains the central issue in negotiations...
Acura pauses MDX Type S production amid emissions uncertainty

Acura pauses MDX Type S production amid emissions uncertainty

- September 18, 2026
On the Dash: Acura pauses the MDX Type S after 2026 with no timeline for its return. The trim is under 10% of MDX sales but delivers outsized margins. Emissions...
Xpeng

Xpeng looks to expand technology partnerships beyond Volkswagen

- September 18, 2026
On the Dash: Xpeng is looking to turn its EV technology into a broader business by licensing systems to other automakers and suppliers. Its Volkswagen partnership shows the potential for...
CBT News
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.