TSLA340.980-1.29%
GM84.740-2.03%
F14.010-0.36%
RIVN14.765-0.595%
CYD46.3001.06%
HMC31.8750.295%
TM189.070-2.04%
CVNA71.450-4.14%
PAG219.150-0.7%
LAD370.815-6.735%
AN205.760-3.65%
GPI258.000-5.95%
ABG207.140-3.52%
SAH81.1800.35%
TSLA340.980-1.29%
GM84.740-2.03%
F14.010-0.36%
RIVN14.765-0.595%
CYD46.3001.06%
HMC31.8750.295%
TM189.070-2.04%
CVNA71.450-4.14%
PAG219.150-0.7%
LAD370.815-6.735%
AN205.760-3.65%
GPI258.000-5.95%
ABG207.140-3.52%
SAH81.1800.35%
TSLA340.980-1.29%
GM84.740-2.03%
F14.010-0.36%
RIVN14.765-0.595%
CYD46.3001.06%
HMC31.8750.295%
TM189.070-2.04%
CVNA71.450-4.14%
PAG219.150-0.7%
LAD370.815-6.735%
AN205.760-3.65%
GPI258.000-5.95%
ABG207.140-3.52%
SAH81.1800.35%

Elon Musk’s Tesla compensation package is still in legal limbo

Tesla Payout

Arguments ended last Friday in the legal battle over Elon Musk’s $55 billion Tesla payout.

In 2018, Musk was awarded a generous pay package by the automaker’s board of directors. Later that year, Tesla shareholder Richard Tornetta filed a lawsuit, arguing that the compensation was unnecessary and harmful to the company’s investors, in whose interests the board is required to act.

The plaintiff’s attorneys focused on two key aspects of the pay negotiations. First, they argued that Musk would have stayed in his position for a much smaller payout, noting that the billionaire had given no signs of leaving the company before 2018. Second, they asserted the board made the offer due to the entrepreneur’s large stake in Tesla, which at the time totaled roughly 20%. The lawsuit alleges that the CEO used this stake as unfair leverage to negotiate the deal and that the automaker’s directors were all too eager to accept his terms.

Dodge Charger Payout

More: Dodge, Chrysler, Tesla facing recalls over airbags

The defense, however, has argued that Musk generated exceptional revenue in his position and that the board’s payout offer was appropriate given his record with Tesla. The attorneys also cited testimony gleaned from the board member’s depositions, which clarified that the compensation was less to retain Musk’s services and more to keep him “focused.” The CEO, who leads multiple businesses, including SpaceX, Neuralink, The Boring Company, and Twitter, has faced previous criticism for being too divided among his projects.

Ordinarily, lawsuits concerning executive payouts are dismissed since courts often defer to the judgment of business leaders to determine their compensation. However, the presiding judge, Kathaleen McCormick, refused to dismiss the case when requested to by the defense, citing Musk’s significant stake in Tesla as a potential issue. The lack of precedent makes this a complex case to adjudicate, and it may be weeks or even months before a decision is reached.


Did you enjoy this article? Please share your thoughts, comments, or questions regarding this topic by connecting with us at newsroom@cbtnews.com.

Be sure to follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, and TikTok to stay up to date.

While you’re here, don’t forget to subscribe to our email newsletter for all the latest auto industry news from CBT News.

More from Articles
NIADA to bring independent dealers to Capitol Hill for 12th annual National Policy Conference

NIADA to bring independent dealers to Capitol Hill for 12th annual National Policy Conference

- August 17, 2026
ARLINGTON, Texas — The National Independent Automobile Dealers Association (NIADA) will host its 12th Annual National Policy Conference September 28-29, 2026, at the Willard InterContinental in Washington, D.C., bringing independent...
Why dealership compliance has to start before the deal, not after

Why dealership compliance has to start before the deal, not after

Compliance is now a daily operating issue, not a once-a-year task  Regulatory pressure on automotive retail is not slowing down. The FTC and state agencies are watching F&I more closely, and...
Ourisman Cars acquires Toyota dealership in North Carolina

Ourisman Cars acquires Toyota dealership in North Carolina

- August 17, 2026
Ourisman Cars has acquired Toyota of Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina, from Barnes Crossing Auto Group. The transaction closed August 3, with the dealership renamed Ourisman Toyota 95. The acquisition gives...
Ford, GM clash over trade policies as Detroit rivalry heats up

Ford, GM clash over trade policies as Detroit rivalry heats up

- August 17, 2026
On the Dash: Tariff changes could affect vehicle pricing, incentives and model profitability across competing brands. Ford and GM’s different supply chains could create uneven cost pressures across their vehicle...
CBT News
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.