TSLA392.500392.5%
GM80.540-0.78%
F12.870-0.005%
RIVN16.92016.92%
CYD44.1700.91%
HMC25.3600.36%
TM215.250-1.95%
CVNA401.89014.36%
PAG162.8201.5%
LAD288.7605.72%
AN209.5301.54%
GPI351.2101.27%
ABG212.7101.27%
SAH71.7801.08%
TSLA392.500392.5%
GM80.540-0.78%
F12.870-0.005%
RIVN16.92016.92%
CYD44.1700.91%
HMC25.3600.36%
TM215.250-1.95%
CVNA401.89014.36%
PAG162.8201.5%
LAD288.7605.72%
AN209.5301.54%
GPI351.2101.27%
ABG212.7101.27%
SAH71.7801.08%
TSLA392.500392.5%
GM80.540-0.78%
F12.870-0.005%
RIVN16.92016.92%
CYD44.1700.91%
HMC25.3600.36%
TM215.250-1.95%
CVNA401.89014.36%
PAG162.8201.5%
LAD288.7605.72%
AN209.5301.54%
GPI351.2101.27%
ABG212.7101.27%
SAH71.7801.08%

Recall visits drive service revenue and long-term customer trust

New data shows recall appointments create consistent traffic, upsell opportunities and critical trust-building moments in the service lane.

Recall visits drive service revenue and long-term customer trust

On the Dash:

  • Recall notices are among the most effective built-in drivers of service traffic, with nearly 9 in 10 customers completing the work.
  • Younger generations are more likely to both complete recall service and approve additional maintenance, creating strong upsell potential.
  • Even when no additional work is performed, recall visits play a critical role in building trust and strengthening long-term customer relationships.

Recalls may be viewed as a routine obligation, but new data shows they are a powerful driver of service department performance across multiple fronts. According to CDK’s latest Service Shopper study, recall visits consistently generate high customer engagement, create opportunities for additional work, and reinforce long-term trust.

The study found that 88% of customers who receive a recall notice ultimately bring their vehicle in for service, underscoring the effectiveness of recalls as a built-in touchpoint. Over the past six months, 35% of service customers reported receiving a recall notification, with the vast majority completing the required work.

Sign up for CBT News’ daily newsletter and get the latest industry stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Younger generations are leading that engagement. Generation Z recorded the highest completion rate at 97%, followed by older millennials at 94% and younger millennials at 89%. Generation X came in at 85%, while baby boomers and the Silent Generation trailed at 69%. The data suggests dealers may not need to heavily market recall visits, as the notification itself is a strong motivator.

Still, 11% of customers who received a recall notice did not schedule service. Among those, concerns varied by generation. 60% of Gen Z respondents cited fear of unexpected repair costs, despite recalls typically being free. More than half of younger millennials said they did not view the recall as necessary, while 38% of Gen X respondents pointed to time constraints. These insights point to opportunities for dealers to improve communication around costs, safety, and convenience options such as flexible scheduling or vehicle pickup.

Beyond completion rates, recall visits are also driving additional revenue. The study found that 40% of customers who came in for recall work approved additional maintenance or repair services during the same visit. Millennials led this trend, with 48% of older millennials and 46% of younger millennials opting for added work, followed by Gen Z at 44% and Gen X at 38%. Older generations were less likely to approve additional services, with just 23% doing so.

Even when additional work is declined, recall visits still deliver value. Nearly half of customers, 48%, completed only the recall service, often because their vehicle did not require further repairs. However, these visits still provide a key opportunity for service teams to demonstrate transparency, explain vehicle condition and build credibility with customers.

While recalls may not always result in immediate upsell opportunities, the consistency of customer traffic and the ability to strengthen relationships position them as a critical component of long-term service department success.

More from Recalls & Safety Updates
Multiple safety issues prompt recalls across Mercedes-Benz, Ford, and GM vehicles, impacting seat belts, airbags, and transmission systems

Recall roundup: Mercedes-Benz, GM, and Ford issue new safety recalls

- April 20, 2026
On the Dash: Mercedes-Benz recalls 2026 GLC models over rear seat belt defect affecting child seat installation. Ford recalls SUVs and pickups for seat belt attachment and gearshift issues linked...
Hyundai ends stop-sale on select 2026 Palisade and Palisade Hybrid models.

Hyundai ends stop-sale of Palisade SUVs, issues critical software fix

- April 15, 2026
On the dash: Hyundai has ended the stop-sale on select 2026 Palisade and Palisade Hybrid trims. A free software update is now available over the air or at dealerships. The...
GM, Ford recall nearly 700,000 U.S. vehicles over safety defects

GM, Ford recall nearly 700,000 U.S. vehicles over safety defects

- April 8, 2026
On the Dash: Nearly 700,000 U.S. vehicles are affected by defects in rearview cameras and windshield wipers. The recalls impact widely used SUVs and trucks, emphasizing potential safety risks for...
Hyundai Palisade

Child death prompts Hyundai Palisade recall across U.S. and Canada

- March 24, 2026
On the Dash: The recall affects 69,060 U.S. units and 7,967 Canadian units, with additional actions affecting 58,000 vehicles in South Korea. The issue involves second- and third-row power seats...
CBT News
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.