TSLA388.311-6.1495%
GM76.905-0.735%
F14.1850.005%
RIVN16.715-1.085%
CYD45.267-0.603%
HMC28.7850.895%
TM179.3002.38%
CVNA69.230-1.36%
PAG206.9406.54%
LAD341.90010.53%
AN209.9756.435%
GPI328.8709.47%
ABG227.9359.505%
SAH102.8003.07%
TSLA388.311-6.1495%
GM76.905-0.735%
F14.1850.005%
RIVN16.715-1.085%
CYD45.267-0.603%
HMC28.7850.895%
TM179.3002.38%
CVNA69.230-1.36%
PAG206.9406.54%
LAD341.90010.53%
AN209.9756.435%
GPI328.8709.47%
ABG227.9359.505%
SAH102.8003.07%
TSLA388.311-6.1495%
GM76.905-0.735%
F14.1850.005%
RIVN16.715-1.085%
CYD45.267-0.603%
HMC28.7850.895%
TM179.3002.38%
CVNA69.230-1.36%
PAG206.9406.54%
LAD341.90010.53%
AN209.9756.435%
GPI328.8709.47%
ABG227.9359.505%
SAH102.8003.07%


Trial Closes – What Do They Really Accomplish?

Trial Closes

Trial closing pits the salesperson against the customer and, in the end, creates negative tension that could have been avoided. BY DAVID LEWIS

Anyone who is familiar with what I teach, or has been exposed to my training for any length of time, knows how I feel about trial closes. Having been associated with the car business for going on 35 years, I can truly say that I see no value in them unless you are trying to put pressure on the customer. It amazes me how many professional trainers still recommend and teach trial closes as a way to sell cars. I understand that it may be acceptable for someone whose sole motivation is to sell a car today at all costs, but if you are trying to build a long-term career based on customer satisfaction and loyalty, the damage of trial closes is undeniable.

Consider the following trial close that has been very popular for many years: “If we can come together on terms and numbers are you willing to buy the car today?” Let’s dissect this trial close and examine this question, which is usually put to a customer after they have landed on a vehicle they seem to like.

“If we can come together on terms and numbers…”

The first thing we see is that this question immediately puts the emphasis on price. You are no longer selling the vehicle, yourself or the dealership. Your total emphasis and incentive for the customer is based on the price they are willing to pay. With most customers, you just put them on the defense. In an effort to push the deal forward for fear of loss, you just told the customer that you will do what it takes price-wise to sell them a car. You haven’t finished presenting all that you have to offer, yet you have started negotiating on the lot before you have earned the right to ask for their business.

Moving along to the second half of this trial close:

“…are you willing to buy this car…? ”

Here you have another problem. You don’t know if the customer has taken mental ownership of the vehicle, yet you are pressuring them to make a buying decision before they even know that this is the car for them. If you have managed to ease some of their defensiveness before you made that statement, you have just reignited it and put them on full alert. They are now thinking, “This person only cares about selling me a car. They are not at all interested in my wants or needs.”

The final word of your trial close question is:

“…today.”

This is the epitome of a pressure word and by using it, you have now affirmed what most people feel about car salespeople: “They want to sell me a car today no matter what I want, or if it is the best thing for me.”

Let’s look at another trial close that is gaining its own popularity with some salespeople:

“On a scale of 1 to 10 how would you rate this car?”

That would be good if you were asking someone to judge a chili cook off, but what kind of answer are you looking for? If they say seven, which most do, then what is your response? The common one is, “So what would it take to make it a 10?” Now you are increasing the pressure even more.

Did you listen when they were telling you what they were looking for during the qualification process, or were you so busy trying to sell them something that you never took the time to find out what they really wanted? If this car doesn’t fit what they are looking for, why are they even at the place where you would ask that kind of question? This is just another example of things that have given us such a bad reputation in the marketplace. It is also another example of deviating from a structured process before it has been brought to the place of asking for the close. Remember, it’s not just the car they are looking for most of the time; they want a salesperson they feel comfortable with and a dealership that they believe will be one they want to do business with.

A well-structured sales process doesn’t require trial closes because the salesperson isn’t going to get to the close until they have earned the right to ask for it. Until the customer has shown evidence of mental ownership and they have had a tremendous demonstration drive followed by a great external walk around and a strong service walk, the trial close has no value. When you know they are comfortable with the vehicle, with you and with the dealership, it is time to go to the closing table and not before.

Why would you want to start closing on the lot when you are probably only three to five minutes from completing your presentation and going to your desk? Why take the risk of negotiating at this point rather than to have the customer sitting comfortably in your office where they would be expecting you to begin negotiations? If you do start negotiating on the lot exactly what do you think you will be negotiating? Price and price alone!

Trial closes send a signal to the customer that you lack confidence in your vehicle and in them as buyers. Every customer knows that you are in the business to sell cars and they have come there because they are most likely looking to buy one. Let your sales presentation have its full effect before you start trying to close the deal. Pressure only makes them wonder why you have to use it and drives them to think maybe you are willing to go lower in the price rather than to lose the sale.

When you have taken ample time in every aspect of the process before moving to the next step, by the time you reach the opportunity to ask for the sale, both you and the customer should know whether they are on the right car and whether or not they like it enough to buy it. Shortcutting the process with trial closes is shortcutting your chances of selling the car and making a good gross. If you have done a good job, why should you need to do that? You don’t. In my experience, trial closes create less sales and lower grosses. It pits the salesperson against the customer and in the end, creates negative tension that could have been avoided completely.

Have confidence in yourself, your abilities, in the dealership and the vehicles that you sell. Do a great job presenting those things and if the customer is happy, you won’t have a problem when it’s time to ask the closing question.


More from Articles
Ford files patent for smart tool tracking system in vehicles

Ford files patent for smart tool tracking system in vehicles

- July 16, 2026
On the Dash: Ford patented a system (US 12,682,191) that tells tool theft from tag failure using sensor data. The system checks toolbox temperature and door/window status before issuing a...
Bosch announces $225 million direct funding agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce

Bosch announces $225 million direct funding agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce

- July 16, 2026
ROSEVILLE, Calif., July 13, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Bosch, a leading provider of technology and services and the largest automotive supplier in the world according to external rankings, announced a definitive agreement...
Stellantis to prioritize four core brands in turnaround strategy, sources say The automaker plans to shift funding toward Jeep, Ram, Peugeot, and Fiat while maintaining its broader portfolio. On the Dash: Expect increased product investment and marketing support for Jeep, Ram, Peugeot and Fiat. Regional and niche brands may see reduced volume but more targeted positioning and shared platforms. Platform-sharing and rebadging strategies could affect inventory mix and model differentiation. Stellantis will concentrate most of its investment on four core brands as CEO Antonio Filosa pushes a turnaround strategy set for release May 21, according to a Reuters exclusive. The automaker has identified Jeep, Ram, Peugeot, and Fiat as its priority brands. It will allocate a “material increase” in funding to them, driven by their stronger global sales and profitability, marking a shift away from the company’s previous approach of distributing investment more evenly across its portfolio. Sign up for CBT News’ daily newsletter and get the latest industry stories delivered straight to your inbox. Stellantis will retain its 14-brand lineup, the largest in the industry, and will not shut down underperforming marques. Instead, the company will reposition secondary brands such as Citroën, Opel and Alfa Romeo to operate in regional or niche roles. These brands will rely on shared platforms and technology developed by the core brands while maintaining distinct styling and market identity. The strategy comes as Stellantis works to regain market share in the United States and Europe while facing growing competition from Chinese EV makers. The company earlier reported a 22.2 billion-euro charge tied to scaling back its EV plans, underscoring the urgency of the strategic shift. Its market valuation has also declined significantly in recent months. To support the transition, Stellantis will expand its use of shared “multi-energy” platforms that support electric, hybrid and internal combustion (ICE) vehicles. Additionally, the company is evaluating rebadging strategies and joint development programs, including collaborations with its Chinese partner, Leapmotor. Executives and investors backing the plan expect the increased focus on core brands to improve efficiency and strengthen financial performance. Analysts say Stellantis could still consider further consolidation if results fall short of expectations. Meta description (140 characters) Stellantis to boost funding for Jeep, Ram, Peugeot and Fiat, shifting strategy while maintaining its 14-brand global portfolio.

Stellantis revives supplier rewards program to drive cost savings

- July 16, 2026
On the Dash: Lower supplier costs could help Stellantis improve profitability while funding future vehicle launches. Changes in supplier contracts may influence production costs, parts pricing and vehicle availability over...
Pricing transparency raises OEM website satisfaction, JD Power finds

Pricing transparency raises OEM website satisfaction, JD Power finds

- July 16, 2026
On the Dash: Pricing transparency is driving satisfaction gains on OEM websites, JD Power finds. Porsche and Dodge rank highest in premium and mass market segments. Shoppers with pricing...
CBT News
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.